Three Questions for CA-2 | Greg Burgess
Public Accountability | CA-2 Congressional Race 2026

Three Questions
Huffman Hasn't Answered

Your salmon. Your National Park. Your public health. This letter asks the questions every CA-2 voter deserves to have answered before June 2, 2026.

Sent April 2, 2026 Certified Mail + Public Record โณ Awaiting Response
๐Ÿ“‹

What is this page?

Greg Burgess is running for Congress in California's 2nd District. He sent a formal letter to the current Congressman, Jared Huffman, asking three important public questions. This page explains those questions in plain language โ€” and tells you exactly why they matter to your family, your land, and your community.

9
Years since fish screens were promised on the Klamath
$500M+
What taxpayers paid for Point Reyes land (today's dollars)
45 yrs
How long a private group now manages your National Park
2.5M
Visitors per year at Point Reyes, on a major bird flu flyway
0
Public answers received so far from Congressman Huffman

Letter sent April 2, 2026. Huffman's response will be published here in full when received.

1
Question One

What happened to the Klamath fish screens?

๐ŸŸ Plain English

In 2016, leaders signed a deal to help save salmon on the Klamath River. Part of that deal promised to build metal screens at farm water canals. Without those screens, salmon swim into the canals and die โ€” they can never find their way back to the river. Nine years later, not one screen has been built. Salmon returning after the biggest dam removal in U.S. history are still getting trapped and dying. Greg is asking: what did you actually do to get this built?

๐Ÿ“… Promise made: 2016๐Ÿšง Screens built: Zero๐Ÿ“ฐ Sources: Herald & News, OPB, KGW, Sierra Club (2025)

"We've had nine years to be able to prepare for this, and here we are."

โ€” Scott White, General Manager, Klamath Drainage District (KGW News, Nov. 2025)

The Klamath River dam removal was the largest in U.S. history โ€” a big win for salmon. But a win is only complete if the fish can actually survive. They can't, because the promised screens were never built. The Klamath Tribes have formally asked Congress to act. A $4.5 million screen project exists โ€” but has no funding.

Greg's QuestionWhat specific steps did you take since 2016 to get these screens funded and built? Who is responsible for the delay โ€” and what is the timeline for installation?
2
Question Two

What happened to your National Park?

๐ŸŒŠ Plain English

Back in the 1960s and 70s, U.S. taxpayers paid about $57 million โ€” worth more than $500 million today โ€” to buy Point Reyes for all Americans. You already own it. In January 2025, a private group called The Nature Conservancy quietly paid about $30 million to get ranchers to leave. Then they got the right to manage roughly 16,000 acres of your park for up to 45 years. The whole deal was done in secret. Per the Press Democrat newspaper, Congressman Huffman himself signed a non-disclosure agreement โ€” meaning he couldn't tell you, his own voters, what was being decided about your park.

๐Ÿ›๏ธ Public paid: ~$57M (>$500M today)๐Ÿ’ฐ TNC paid ranchers: ~$30M๐Ÿ“ Acres managed: ~16,000โณ Lease: Up to 45 years๐Ÿค Done in: Secret mediation

Who gave permission to use private money for public land? The U.S. Constitution says Congress controls the money for federal land. No Congressional vote approved TNC's role. No one has publicly explained what law allows this.

Was the environmental review outdated? The environmental study was finished in 2020. The situation changed significantly by 2025. No new review was done.

What's the legal basis for a 45-year private arrangement? No open bidding. No public competition. A private group now manages your park for nearly half a century. What law allows that โ€” and what stops the same process from being used for oil or gas leases someday?

Why were voters kept in the dark? The Press Democrat reported Congressman Huffman signed an NDA โ€” meaning your own representative couldn't tell you what was decided about your land. Greg had to file a federal public records request (FOIA) just to find out โ€” and even that wasn't answered on time.

Greg's QuestionsWhat law allowed private money to be used for this public land deal? Should there have been a new environmental review? What limits a private group's role in your National Park โ€” and why were voters kept in the dark?
3
Question Three

Is bird flu being tracked at Point Reyes?

CDC Official Statement

THE CDC CURRENTLY DESCRIBES THE H5N1 RISK TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC AS LOW.

There is no current outbreak at Point Reyes. This question is about preparedness and monitoring โ€” making sure the right systems are in place before a problem starts.

🦅 Plain English

Bird flu (H5N1) is a serious illness that spread from wild birds into dairy cows for the first time in 2024. Point Reyes sits right in the middle of the Pacific Flyway โ€” a major path that millions of migratory birds travel every year. Those birds can carry bird flu. 2.5 million people visit Point Reyes every year. The old dairy farmers were legally required to test their cows for bird flu. The new conservation cattle are not under the same rules. No one has publicly explained what monitoring plan is in place.

🦆 Major Pacific Flyway site🧪 Old ranches: Required federal testing❓ New cattle rules: Not publicly stated👪 2.5M visitors/year📍 H5N1 confirmed in Marin County (CDFA)

The CDC states the current risk to the general public is LOW โ€” and Greg is not suggesting otherwise. This is about preparedness: having a clear, public monitoring plan in place before a problem could start. California's Department of Food and Agriculture has confirmed bird flu in Marin County. The park sits on a flyway used by hundreds of thousands of birds every year. It is a fair and responsible question: what is the monitoring plan?

Greg's QuestionsWhat bird flu monitoring is happening for cattle at Point Reyes right now? Are those cattle under the same federal rules as the dairy farms they replaced? If not โ€” should Congress create those rules?

Read the Full Letter

Complete public documents sent to Congressman Huffman, April 2, 2026. Any response received will be published here in full.

Gregory Burgess No Party Preference Candidate, California's 2nd Congressional District FEC ID C00938837 | San Rafael, California | 415-384-1536 April 2, 2026 The Honorable Jared Huffman Member of Congress, California's 2nd Congressional District United States House of Representatives | Washington, D.C. 20515 RE: Three Questions for the Voters of CA-2 on Klamath Commitments, Point Reyes Process, and H5N1 Preparedness Dear Congressman Huffman, I am writing to you as a candidate for the seat you currently hold, as a third-generation Marin County native, and as a former CDC Quarantine Public Health Officer. I am writing publicly because the voters of CA-2 deserve to hear both your answers and mine. I have three questions. They are not rhetorical, and they are not accusations of personal wrongdoing. They are requests for public explanation about matters on which you have spoken publicly, taken positions, or been publicly associated by the press. QUESTION ONE: THE KLAMATH FISH SCREENS In 2016, you were present when the Klamath Power and Facilities Agreement was signed. That agreement committed to funding and installing fish screens at irrigation diversions throughout the Upper Klamath Basin. By late 2025 โ€” nine years later โ€” local reporting indicated those screens had still not been installed, even as returning salmon were entering irrigation canals after dam removal. The Klamath Drainage District's own general manager stated: "We've had nine years to be able to prepare for this, and here we are." What specific steps have you taken since 2016 to secure funding and installation of the fish screens? What funded timeline now exists for installation? QUESTION TWO: THE POINT REYES SETTLEMENT In the 1960s and 1970s, Congress authorized approximately $57 million โ€” worth over $500 million in today's dollars โ€” to purchase the Point Reyes ranch lands. The public already owns this land. The Nature Conservancy then provided reportedly at least $30 million to compensate ranchers for surrendering their leases on land the public purchased decades ago. No Congressional appropriation was sought. No public vote was held. The Press Democrat reported that you yourself were under a non-disclosure agreement in connection with the settlement negotiations. What statutory authority authorized NPS or the Department of Interior to rely on private funds to resolve this dispute? Should a new environmental review have been prepared? What legal principle limits this model from being used in future federal land disputes? QUESTION THREE: H5N1 AT POINT REYES IMPORTANT: THE CDC CURRENTLY DESCRIBES THE H5N1 RISK TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC AS LOW. This question is about preparedness and monitoring โ€” not an active outbreak. Point Reyes sits on the Pacific Flyway. The park's environmental review was completed in 2020 โ€” four years before H5N1 was first detected in U.S. dairy cattle. The commercial dairies removed under the settlement were subject to federal H5N1 testing requirements. The conservation-grazing cattle being reintroduced by The Nature Conservancy are not commercial dairy operations and are not subject to the same requirements. No equivalent biosurveillance protocol has been publicly identified. Point Reyes receives 2.5 million visitors per year. What biosurveillance protocols has NPS or The Nature Conservancy adopted for cattle at Point Reyes? Are those cattle subject to federal order testing? If not, should Congress address that gap? CONCLUSION These questions are asked in good faith. If you provide a response, that response will be published in full alongside this letter so that voters can evaluate both the questions and your answers for themselves. Respectfully, Gregory Burgess | NPP Candidate, CA-2 | Former CDC Quarantine Public Health Officer gregoryburgessforcongress.com | 415-384-1536
PRESS BACKGROUNDER | Gregory Burgess, NPP Candidate CA-2 | April 2, 2026 โ•โ•โ• KLAMATH FISH SCREENS โ•โ•โ• โ€ข 2016 KPFA committed to "entrainment reduction facilities" at irrigation diversions โ€ข Nov 2025: Zero screens installed in Klamath Drainage District โ€” nine years later โ€ข Largest dam removal in U.S. history completed 2024; Chinook salmon entering canals and dying โ€ข KGW: Scott White stated "We've had nine years to be able to prepare for this, and here we are" โ€ข Klamath Tribes requested congressional action; $3.17M stream restoration funds sought โ€ข $4.5M Ady Canal project planned โ€” unfunded and uninstalled SOURCES: Herald and News Nov 4 | OPB Nov 10 | KGW Nov 18 | Sierra Club Nov 26 (all 2025) โ•โ•โ• POINT REYES SETTLEMENT โ•โ•โ• โ€ข Jan 8, 2025: NPS Revised Record of Decision โ€ข Congress paid ~$57M (>$500M today per former Interior lawyers, Press Democrat) in 1960sโ€“70s โ€ข TNC paid reportedly โ‰ฅ$30M (some media: $40M โ€” exact amount undisclosed) to 12 operations โ€ข ~16,000 acres reclassified; TNC arrangement: 5-yr option + 20-yr lease + 2ร—10-yr renewals = up to 45 yrs โ€ข No Congressional appropriation or vote publicly identified โ€ข No supplemental NEPA review publicly identified โ€ข Confidential mediation; NDAs for all parties including ranching families โ€ข Per Press Democrat (Feb 8, 2025): Huffman himself under NDA โ€ข FOIA DOI-2026-003984 filed โ€” not processed timely โ€ข Two lawsuits filed challenging settlement โ€ข Constitutional questions: Appropriations Clause (Art. I ยง9 Cl.7) + Property Clause (Art. IV ยง3 Cl.2) SOURCES: NPS ROD Jan 8 2025 | Press Democrat Feb 8 + Sep 13 2025 | Resource Renewal Institute Jan 7 2026 | Advocates for the West May 16 2025 โ•โ•โ• H5N1 BIOSURVEILLANCE โ•โ•โ• NOTE: THE CDC CURRENTLY DESCRIBES THE H5N1 RISK TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC AS LOW. This section addresses preparedness and monitoring gaps โ€” not an active outbreak. โ€ข Point Reyes Final EIS: 2020. H5N1 in U.S. dairy cattle: March 2024. Four-year gap. โ€ข USDA federal H5N1 order: April 2024 โ€” designed for commercial dairy operations โ€ข CDFA: H5N1 confirmed in Marin County; 43 CA dairy herds re-quarantined 2025 โ€ข Removed ranches: USDA-regulated, enrolled in National Milk Testing Strategy โ€ข TNC conservation cattle: Not commercial dairy; not subject to same federal order testing โ€ข No publicly identified equivalent biosurveillance protocol for returning cattle โ€ข 2.5 million visitors/year; Pacific Flyway location SOURCES: CDFA H5N1 Updates 2025โ€“26 | USDA APHIS Federal Order Apr 2024 | NPS ROD Jan 8 2025 | Nature Communications May 2025
Greg Burgess
NPP Candidate, CA-2
๐Ÿฅ Former CDC Quarantine Officer ๐Ÿ“š Former Special Ed Teacher ๐ŸŒฟ 3rd-Gen Marin County Native ๐Ÿ—ณ๏ธ No Party Preference
"Show Your Work"

Why Greg is asking these questions

Greg grew up in Mill Valley and San Rafael. His family has been connected to the lands and waters of this district for three generations. Point Reyes National Seashore was part of his childhood.

As a former CDC public health officer, Greg knows what it means to ask hard questions in the public interest. His campaign motto is "Show Your Work" โ€” because voters deserve to know not just what their representatives say, but what they actually did.

These are not attacks. They are honest questions about real commitments, real land that belongs to all of us, and real public health responsibilities. Every voter in CA-2 deserves answers before June 2, 2026.

These questions belong to all of us.

Share this page. Tell your neighbors. The voters of CA-2 deserve answers before June 2, 2026.

Visit gregoryburgessforcongress.com

Sources cited on this page

Herald and News โ€” Klamath fish screens, Nov 4, 2025
OPB / Northwest News Network โ€” Nov 10, 2025
KGW News โ€” Klamath irrigation, Nov 18, 2025
Sierra Club โ€” Upper Klamath, Nov 26, 2025
NPS Press Release โ€” PRNS Revised ROD, Jan 8, 2025
Press Democrat โ€” Huffman NDA, Feb 8, 2025
Press Democrat โ€” 45-year lease structure, Sep 13, 2025
Press Democrat โ€” $57M federal purchase (former Interior lawyers)
Resource Renewal Institute โ€” Jan 7, 2026
Advocates for the West โ€” May 16, 2025
CDC โ€” Current H5N1 risk to general public: LOW
CDFA โ€” H5N1 Livestock Updates, 2025โ€“2026
USDA APHIS โ€” Federal H5N1 Order, April 2024
Nature Communications โ€” H5N1 model, May 2025
FOIA DOI-2026-003984 โ€” filed by Greg Burgess