Point Reyes | Gregory Burgess for Congress · CA-2
🌿 The Issue That Started Everything

Point Reyes
Belongs to All of Us

Twelve ranching families. Eighty-nine farmworkers. 150 years of history. All removed in secret — without a single public hearing. Greg was already researching whether to run for Congress when he drove to Point Reyes on December 11, 2025 — and discovered the ranchers were gone. The issue found him ten days before he gathered his first signature.

🐄 12 Families Displaced 📋 No Public Hearing 🌊 Federal Land Issue ⚖️ Your Democratic Right
↓ Scroll to learn more
The Accurate Timeline

How Greg and Point Reyes Found Each Other

Point Reyes did not inspire Greg to run for Congress. He was still researching whether to run when he drove out there. He discovered the ranchers were gone on December 11, 2025 — ten days before he gathered his first nomination signature, and nearly two months before he filed his candidacy papers. The issue and the candidacy grew together. Neither caused the other.

🎭
The Seed
Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert at the National Mall
Watching two of the sharpest political voices of their generation stand at the National Mall and tell their audience "this is as far as we can take you" — Greg decided he didn't want to be like the two senior Muppets in the balcony, complaining about Kermit's show while doing nothing to help. If the satirists were tapping out, someone had to actually do something. That thought stayed with him for years.
📋
During COVID
He Wrote 38 Bills
While the world was locked down, Greg drafted 38+ complete federal bills — real legislation in full congressional format, with constitutional analysis, spending caps, and sunset provisions. Not talking points. Bills. The policy work came years before any campaign.
💙
A Hard Two Years
Disability. Depression. A Decision.
Greg is open about this: he spent two years on disability for depression. In November 2025, he made a decision — to start seriously researching whether and how to run for the 2026 midterms. Not filed. Not committed. Researching. He began learning the process.
♻️
December 9, 2025
Presents Biogas–Compost Solution to Marin County Board of Supervisors
Still researching — not filed, no signatures gathered — Greg presents his forest slash–livestock manure–biogas–composting framework to the Marin County Board of Supervisors as a citizen. Two days later, he drives to Point Reyes to check whether the idea is actually workable in the field.
🐄
December 11, 2025 · The Discovery
He Drives to Point Reyes — and the Ranchers Are Gone
Greg arrives expecting to talk to ranchers about composting logistics. Instead, he finds families displaced, barns emptying, 150 years of agricultural knowledge being packed up and removed. He discovers the 2025 Record of Decision — issued through a secret mediation with non-disclosure agreements, no public hearings, and no NEPA review. As a former Hawaii Department of Land and Natural Resources agent, he knows exactly what a public process failure looks like. This is one.
Key fact: This is 8 days before Greg gathers his first nomination signature, and 55 days before he files candidacy papers. Point Reyes did not create his candidacy. It became part of it.
✍️
December 19, 2025
Begins Gathering Nomination Signatures
Eight days after discovering the Point Reyes situation, Greg takes his first formal step toward the ballot — beginning to collect the nomination signatures required to appear on the June 2, 2026 primary ballot. The candidacy and the advocacy have now both begun, separately, converging.
🗳️
February 4, 2026
Files Candidacy Papers Officially
Gregory Burgess officially becomes a candidate for California's 2nd Congressional District, No Party Preference. The campaign platform — 38 bills, the Show Your Work philosophy, food security, rural healthcare, federal land accountability — had been building for years. Point Reyes is now a central part of it. But it was never the reason.

"I was researching whether to run — not yet committed — when I drove to Point Reyes on December 11, 2025 to see if my composting idea was feasible. The ranchers were gone. I knew immediately what kind of process failure that was. Eight days later I started gathering signatures. The issue didn't make me a candidate. But it made me a more determined one."

— Gregory Burgess · Candidate, CA-2 · No Party Preference
Watch It Yourself

December 9, 2025 — Marin County Board of Supervisors

Still researching whether to run — no signatures gathered, no papers filed — Greg presented his biogas–compost solution to the Marin County Board of Supervisors as a private citizen on December 9, 2025. Two days later he drove to Point Reyes to check whether the idea was workable. That is when he found the ranchers were gone.

Watch the Presentation
Marin County Board of Supervisors · December 9, 2025
gregoryburgessforcongress.com/point-reyes-national-seashore Watch Now
What Greg Proposed

The forest slash–livestock manure–biogas–composting framework: combine displaced ranch waste with forest cuttings in anaerobic digesters → produce clean methane energy → turn the leftover material into rich compost → rebuild West Marin's soil → reduce wildfire fuel loads. Zero new land required. Revenue-positive. Measurable. This is what "Show Your Work" looks like before you even announce a campaign.

What Happened

A Secret Deal Changed Everything

Point Reyes National Seashore is a beautiful stretch of California coast that belongs to all Americans. For 150 years, ranching families lived there, producing some of the world's finest dairy and beef — and keeping the land healthy. Then in January 2025, everything changed behind closed doors.

🏡
1962 — The Beginning
Congress Buys Point Reyes for Everyone
The U.S. government bought Point Reyes for about $57.5 million — worth over $600 million today. Congress specifically said the ranching families should stay. Their farms were part of the plan.[10]
📄
2021 — The Public Process Works
Over 9,000 People Weigh In
The National Park Service did a full environmental study with over 7,600 public comments. The result: 20-year leases for the farming families. Democracy in action. The system worked.[12,15]
🚪
2022–2024 — The Secret Deal
Two and a Half Years Behind Closed Doors
Environmental groups sued. What followed was two and a half years of secret talks — no public hearings, no public comment, non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) that silenced the ranching families. You were locked out.
💰
January 2025 — The Settlement
A Private Corporation Pays $30 Million for Public Land Control
The Nature Conservancy — a private organization with $1.5 billion in annual revenue — paid $30 million to effectively take over management of 18,000 acres of your public land. No public bidding. No independent appraisal. No NEPA environmental review of the settlement itself.[11,16]
🌟
Today — The Fight Back
Ranchers, Farmworkers, and Citizens Push Back
Nicolette Niman, Bill Niman, and displaced families are fighting in federal court. Greg Burgess has filed formal challenges, FOIA requests, and legislative proposals to restore accountability. The story is not over.
What Was Lost

Real People. Real Food. Real History.

This was not just a policy change. Real families lost their homes, their livelihoods, and their futures — with no warning, no severance, and no public hearing.

🐄
Farming Families
12
Multi-generational ranching and dairy operations removed — farms that collectively won 4 awards at the 2024 World Cheese Awards (Viseu, Portugal), 4 awards at the American Cheese Society, 3 Good Food Awards, and 11 awards at the California State Fair. They represented ~20% of Marin's agricultural products.[1,2,3,4,5]
👨‍👩‍👧‍👦
People Displaced
150+
Marin County estimates over 150 low-income residents — primarily Latino farmworker families, many multigenerational — are experiencing or at risk of homelessness on agricultural lands. Marin County declared a shelter crisis on March 11, 2025 directly because of this displacement.[6,7]
🏆
World Recognition
150
Years of farming history — recognized at the 2024 World Dairy Summit in Paris as a living model of climate-smart agriculture. U.S. Interior Secretary Salazar stated these farms serve as "a national model for responsible food production in sensitive environmental habitats."[8,9]
🔒
Families Silenced
NDA
Every ranching family was required to sign a Non-Disclosure Agreement as a condition of their settlement. They cannot speak publicly. Their neighbors speak for them. An estimated 50 children living on impacted ranches face displacement.[6]
The Numbers Don't Lie

Your Money. Their Deal.

The American taxpayer paid to build Point Reyes into what it was. A private organization bought control of it for pennies on the dollar.

$600M+
What taxpayers paid to create Point Reyes in today's dollars — Congress specifically included the ranching community[10]
$30M
What The Nature Conservancy paid to gain effective control of 18,000 acres — roughly 7 cents on the dollar[11]
7,600+
Public comments submitted on the 2020 General Management Plan Amendment — the public process that preceded the secret settlement[12]
$0
Number of public hearings held before the secret settlement was signed. Zero. Not one. For a $600 million public asset.[11]
The Big Picture

Why NEPA Matters to Every American

NEPA — the National Environmental Policy Act — is the law that says before the government makes big decisions about public land, they must tell the public and take comments. It is your legal right to have a voice. At Point Reyes, that right was taken away.[13,14]

🏫

Think of it like a school building being sold

Imagine your local public school — built with taxpayer money — being sold to a private company. By law, there must be public hearings. Parents and neighbors get to speak. But what if the school board sold it anyway through secret meetings, with a gag order on the principal? That is exactly what happened at Point Reyes. The "school" is 18,000 acres of your land. The "gag order" is the NDA. And the law that was broken is called NEPA.

🌎

This is not just a California problem

The blueprint used at Point Reyes — private mediation, no public hearings, NDA enforcement, private money substituting for Congressional appropriation — is now being used by the current administration to open offshore oil drilling on the California coast. When one public land is managed without public input, it becomes the template for every public land. That's why ranchers in Montana and Colorado are watching this case.

The Congressman's Record

Huffman Said One Thing. Then Did Another.

The documented record of Representative Huffman's public positions on Point Reyes ranching — and what he did behind closed doors — raises serious questions that voters deserve answered. Every entry below is sourced to primary documents or on-record named sources.

📜
August–September 2018
Huffman Introduces and Passes H.R. 6687 — The Point Reyes Protection Act
Huffman introduces a bipartisan bill to protect Point Reyes ranching families and provide 20-year leases. The bill passes the House on September 25, 2018, with bipartisan support. Huffman's stated position: Congress's intent is that sustainable ranching is a permanent part of the Seashore. The bill dies in the Senate but establishes Huffman's public commitment on record.[H1]
September 13, 2021
NPS Issues Record of Decision — 20-Year Leases Approved After Public Process
After a multi-year public Environmental Impact Statement process with thousands of public comments, the National Park Service issues a Record of Decision authorizing 20-year ranch leases — described as "a model where wilderness and ranching can coexist side-by-side." This was the democratic process working as designed. Huffman publicly supported it.[H2,H3]
📞
February 2022 · The Pivot
Huffman Initiates the Confidential Mediation
According to the Press Democrat's two-part investigative series, relying on on-record named sources, Huffman personally calls Michael Mantell of the Resources Legacy Fund in February 2022 — immediately after environmental groups file suit — to initiate the confidential mediation that would ultimately reverse the 2021 ROD. No public announcement. No public hearing. The mediation is placed under non-disclosure agreements from the start.[H4]
🔒
2022–2024 · Two and a Half Years
Secret Mediation — No Public Hearings, NDA Required
For two and a half years, the most consequential public-lands decision in Point Reyes history is negotiated behind closed doors. Ranching families, farmworkers, and the public are excluded. Participants sign NDAs that function as gag orders. The Nature Conservancy is brought in as the funder and managing partner. According to TNC's own reporting, approximately $30 million is assembled for the buyout — without public bidding, independent appraisal, or Congressional appropriation.[H4,H5,H6]
📋
January 8, 2025
Revised Record of Decision — 12 Ranch Operations Removed
The NPS issues a Revised Record of Decision. Twelve multi-generational ranch operations are transferred to the scenic landscape zone. TNC receives a lease structure of 5 years initial + 20-year option + two additional 10-year options = 45 years total over approximately 17,000 acres of public land. Huffman endorses the settlement. The deal achieves the exact opposite of the bill he passed in 2018.[H3,H5,H7]
🏛️
April 2025
House Natural Resources Committee Opens Investigation
House Natural Resources Committee Chair Bruce Westerman sends a formal letter to The Nature Conservancy, the National Park Service, and related parties demanding document preservation and production. The House committee is investigating how a confidential private deal replaced a public congressional process. Huffman calls the investigation the work of "partisan opportunists."[H8,H9]
Today — The Question
What Greg Is Asking Huffman to Answer
In 2018, Huffman authored legislation protecting these ranching families. In 2021, he supported the public process that gave them 20-year leases. In 2022, he initiated the confidential mediation that would remove them. In 2025, he endorsed the result. He has held zero public hearings on any of this. Greg Burgess is asking one question: Congressman, when did you change your mind, why, and why didn't the public get to weigh in?
Source Note

The "Behind the Scenes" claims in this timeline rely primarily on the Press Democrat's two-part investigative series by reporter D. Brennan (January–February 2025), which is based on on-record named sources including Michael Mantell, representatives of TNC, and direct statements by Huffman himself. These constitute the highest-quality available secondary source for the 2022–2025 confidential mediation period. For formal legal or regulatory use, the underlying primary documents — NPS internal records, Resources Legacy Fund IRS Form 990s, TNC grant records — should be independently obtained. Full APA citations are in the References section below.

What Greg Has Done

He Didn't Just Talk. He Acted.

Greg was already researching how to run for Congress when he discovered the Point Reyes crisis — not the other way around. What he found there, as a former Hawaii Department of Land and Natural Resources agent who knows what proper public process looks like, made him a more determined candidate. The advocacy and the candidacy have grown together. Here is the documented record of what he has actually done.

1

📋 DOI Inspector General Complaint

Filed a formal ethics complaint documenting six specific failures by Representative Huffman and the NPS — including NDA suppression of First Amendment rights, failure of Congressional appropriations authority, and the H5N1 biosurveillance gap now active at Point Reyes itself.

2

📁 FOIA Request (DOI-2026-003984)

Filed a 25-category Freedom of Information Act request to the Department of the Interior seeking all records on the January 2025 settlement — asking what changed between the 2021 public process and the 2025 secret deal.

3

✉️ Mailed Letters to 988 Households

Personally paid to send a four-page letter — not an email, a real letter — to approximately 988 Point Reyes and West Marin residents explaining the settlement, the NEPA bypass, and how to demand accountability. This was before he was a candidate.

4

📜 Wrote the Federal Lands Stewardship and Human Sustenance Act

Drafted federal legislation to prevent this from ever happening again — requiring Congressional authorization, NEPA review, and public hearings before any private organization can acquire management control of National Seashore land.

5

🏛️ Briefed 104 Congressional Offices

Briefed staff in 104 congressional offices across both parties on the Agricultural Resilience Imperative — connecting the Point Reyes food security loss to the national food supply crisis.

6

📰 Published in 5 States

Published letters to the editor in Montana, Colorado, Delaware, and California explaining why this California issue matters across the American West — and beyond. When federal land precedent is set, every state feels it.

"I will accept whatever decision Congress makes after a fair, open, public process. If Congress holds field hearings, hears testimony from all stakeholders, and determines that removing the ranchers serves the public interest — I will respect that decision. What I cannot accept is a decision of this magnitude made in secret, funded by an outside corporation, and enforced through NDAs that silence American citizens. This is not about the outcome. This is about the process."
— Gregory Burgess · Third-Generation Marin County Native · NPP Candidate, CA-2
What You Can Do

Your Voice Still Matters

The ranching families signed NDAs. You didn't. You are a free American citizen with the right to speak to your government. Here is how.

⚖️

File an Ethics Complaint

Greg has created a free template you can use to file your own complaint about the PRNS settlement process with the House Committee on Ethics. You don't need a lawyer — you need your voice and your name.

Get the Template
📞

Contact Rep. Huffman

Ask him one simple question: why has he held zero public hearings on a decision that displaced 89 people from their homes and removed 12 world-class farms from public land?

Contact His Office
📖

Read Greg's Bills

The From Seashore to Stockyard Act and the Federal Lands Stewardship and Human Sustenance Act are fully drafted legislation — not talking points — that would prevent this from happening again on any public land in America.

Read the Bills

"I took field trips to Point Reyes with Mrs. Terwilliger in elementary school. I watched this community work because families and land took care of each other. I tip 20% to whoever makes and serves my food — it is a sacred act. I depend on farmers, ranchers, and fishermen for my very existence. The decision made in January 2025 was made without you. Every conversation from here forward will not be."

— Gregory Burgess · Candidate, CA-2 · No Party Preference
Sources & Citations

Research & Documentation

All factual claims on this page are documented below. Citations follow APA 7th edition format. "Show Your Work" applies here too.

[1] Point Reyes Farmstead Cheese Company. (2024, November 26). Point Reyes Farmstead Cheese earns multiple honors at prestigious World Cheese Awards in Portugal. Retrieved from https://pointreyescheese.com/blogs/the-blog/point-reyes-farmstead-cheese-earns-multiple-honors-at-prestigious-world-cheese-awards-in-portugal [4 awards: Silver — TomaRashi, Fennel Blue; Bronze — TomaProvence, TomaTruffle; 240 judges from 40 countries; 4,000+ cheeses evaluated; Viseu, Portugal]
[2] American Cheese Society. (2024). 41st annual ACS Judging & Competition awards — "Cheese for Real," Buffalo, NY, July 10–13, 2024. American Cheese Society. Retrieved from https://www.cheesesociety.org/assets/Uploads/Elements/FileList/JC-Winner-List-2024.pdf [4 awards: 1st place TomaTruffle — American Originals Flavored Cheese; 2nd place Truffle Brie — Soft Ripened Flavored Cheese; 3rd place Bay Blue — Rinded Blue Mold Cheeses; 3rd place Fennel Blue — Flavored Rinded Blue Mold Cheese]
[3] Point Reyes Farmstead Cheese Company. (2024, January). Three big wins for Point Reyes Farmstead Cheese Company at the 2024 Good Food Awards. Retrieved from https://pointreyescheese.com/blogs/the-blog/three-big-wins-for-point-reyes-farmstead-cheese-company-at-the-2024-good-food-awards [Only cheese producer to win 3 awards: Bay Blue, TomaRashi, TomaTruffle; Portland, OR]
[4] California Department of Food and Agriculture. (2024). 2024 California State Fair Commercial Cheese Competition results. California State Fair. [Point Reyes Farmstead Cheese Co. received 11 awards; Toma, TomaRashi, and Aged Gouda received "Best in California" designation]
[5] Point Reyes Seashore Ranchers Association. (n.d.). About PRSRA. Retrieved from http://www.prsranchersassociation.com/ ["The multi-generational farming families of the PRSRA produce roughly 20% of Marin's agricultural products, supplying cheese, milk, pastured eggs, meats and other valued local foods throughout the Bay Area and Northern California"]
[6] County of Marin, Housing and Federal Grants Division. (2025, August). Housing solutions: Emergency temporary housing — West Marin displacement crisis staff report. Marin County Board of Supervisors. Retrieved from https://marin.granicus.com/MetaViewer.php?view_id=15&event_id=4097&meta_id=1408027 ["An estimated 127 individuals across 37 households face imminent displacement"; "Approximately 50 children currently living on impacted ranches"; over 150 low-income residents at risk of homelessness; Resolution 2025-14]
[7] County of Marin. (2025, March 12). County declares shelter crisis to provide temporary emergency housing. [Press release]. Retrieved from https://www.marincounty.gov/news-releases/county-declares-shelter-crisis-provide-temporary-emergency-housing [Resolution 2025-14, March 11, 2025; specifically names Point Reyes National Seashore ranch/dairy tenants displaced by January 2025 settlement]
[8] Straus, A. (2025, November 26). A call to save our farms, food and community. Point Reyes Light. Retrieved from https://www.ptreyeslight.com/opinion/a-call-to-save-our-farms-food-and-community/ ["Straus Dairy Farm's carbon-neutral model has been recognized internationally, including at the 2024 World Dairy Summit in Paris, France, affirming that our region is a living example of climate-smart agriculture and sustainable stewardship"]
[9] Salazar, K. (2012, November 29). Secretary Salazar issues decision on Point Reyes National Seashore permit [Press release]. U.S. Department of the Interior. Retrieved from https://www.doi.gov/news/pressreleases/secretary-salazar-issues-decision-on-point-reyes-national-seashore-permit ["Ranching operations have a long and important history on the Point Reyes peninsula and will be continued at Point Reyes National Seashore. I have directed that the Superintendent work with the operators of these ranches to ensure that sustainable agriculture production continues and plays an important role in the local economy." Also directed 20-year permit extensions "to support the continued presence of sustainable ranching and dairy operations."]
[10] Point Reyes National Seashore Act, Pub. L. No. 87-657, 76 Stat. 538 (1962); amended by Pub. L. No. 95-625 (1978). [Establishing legislation; 1978 amendments broadened agricultural protections and directed continuation of "agricultural, ranching, or dairying purposes" within the pastoral zone]
[11] Environmental Action Committee of West Marin. (n.d.). GMPA: General Management Plan Amendment background. Retrieved from https://www.eacmarin.org/gmpa2017 [18,000 acres confirmed leased to ranching; 72,000 total acres; NPS NEPA process history]
[12] Coalition to Protect America's National Parks. (2021, July 6). Coalition signs on in opposition to General Management Plan Amendment for Point Reyes National Seashore. Retrieved from https://protectnps.org/2021/07/06/coalition-signs-on-in-opposition-to-general-management-plan-amendment-for-point-reyes-national-seashore/ [More than 7,600 public comments received on GMPA; California Coastal Commission received more than 45,000 public comments; NPS initiated GMPA in fall 2017]
[13] Council on Environmental Quality. (2007, December). A citizen's guide to NEPA: Having your voice heard. Executive Office of the President. Retrieved from https://ceq.doe.gov/docs/get-involved/citizens_guide_dec07.pdf [NEPA requires federal agencies to assess and publicly disclose environmental impacts; establishes public comment rights]
[14] Council on Environmental Quality. (1996). The National Environmental Policy Act: A study of its effectiveness after twenty-five years. Executive Office of the President. Retrieved from https://ceq.doe.gov/docs/ceq-publications/nepa25fn.pdf ["Study participants applauded NEPA for opening the federal process to public input and were convinced that this open process has improved the effectiveness of project design and implementation"]
[15] National Park Service. (2021, September). Record of Decision: General Management Plan Amendment, Point Reyes National Seashore and north district of Golden Gate National Recreation Area. U.S. Department of the Interior. [Authorized 20-year leases following multi-year public EIS process; described as "a model where wilderness and ranching can coexist side-by-side"]
[16] West Marin Fund. (2025, March 11). Housing solutions update. Retrieved from https://westmarinfund.org/march-2025-housing-update/ ["The January 2025 settlement between three environmental groups, the National Park Service, and the nearby farm and ranching operations will result in the closure of 12 ranches within Point Reyes National Seashore"; more than 100 Latino farmworkers facing displacement]
[17] Beyond Pesticides. (2025, February 26). Historic coexistence of organic agriculture and nature interrupted by forced farm closures at Point Reyes National Seashore. Retrieved from https://beyondpesticides.org/dailynewsblog/2025/02/organic-agriculture-and-nature-forced-farm-closures-point-reyes/ [Confirms 18,000 acres leased; Straus Family Creamery sourced one-third of organic milk from PRNS ranches; cites Agricultural Institute of Marin director on climate-smart agriculture]
[18] Huffman, J. (2018). Huffman introduces bill on sustainable management of Point Reyes National Seashore. [Press release]. Office of U.S. Representative Jared Huffman. Retrieved from https://huffman.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/rep-huffman-introduces-bill-on-sustainable-management-of-the-point-reyes-national-seashore [H.R. 6687 — directed Secretary of Interior to maintain working dairies and ranches; passed the House; cites "Congress' longstanding intent"]
Huffman Timeline — Additional Sources
[H1] Point Reyes Protection Act, H.R. 6687, 115th Cong. (2018). Introduced Aug. 28, 2018; passed the House Sep. 25, 2018; died in the Senate, Dec. 2018. https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/6687 [Bipartisan; would have directed Secretary of Interior to provide 20-year leases; established Huffman's public legislative commitment to ranching families]
[H2] National Park Service. (2021, September 13). Record of decision: General management plan amendment for Point Reyes National Seashore [Alternative B — 20-year ranch leases with operational upgrades]. U.S. Department of the Interior. https://www.nps.gov/pore/learn/news/newsreleases-20210913-gmpa-mendment-rod.htm [Described publicly as "a model where wilderness and ranching can coexist side-by-side"; result of multi-year public EIS process]
[H3] National Park Service. (2025, January 8). Revised record of decision for general management plan amendment and settlement agreement on the management of ranching on park lands. U.S. Department of the Interior. https://www.nps.gov/pore/getinvolved/planning_gmp_amendment.htm [Revised ROD issued January 6, 2025; publicly announced January 8, 2025; 12 ranch operations transferred to scenic landscape zone; reversed Alternative B from September 2021]
[H4] Brennan, D. (2025, January 29). How The Nature Conservancy came to broker a secret deal to end Point Reyes National Seashore's ranching era [Part 1 of 2]. Press Democrat. https://www.pressdemocrat.com/article/news/point-reyes-seashore-ranching-nature-conservancy/ [Primary source for Huffman's February 2022 call to Michael Mantell of Resources Legacy Fund initiating confidential mediation; relies on on-record named sources]
[H5] Brennan, D. (2025, February 8). Secret deal brokered by The Nature Conservancy to end most ranching in Point Reyes National Seashore faced opposition from outset [Part 2 of 2]. Press Democrat. https://www.pressdemocrat.com/2025/02/08/point-reyes-seashore-ranches-nature-conservancy/ [Describes 2022–2025 confidential mediation structure; NDA requirements; TNC's financial role; on-record named sources]
[H6] The Nature Conservancy. (2025). Point Reyes National Seashore: A path forward. The Nature Conservancy. https://www.nature.org/en-us/about-us/where-we-work/united-states/california/stories-in-california/point-reyes-path-forward/ [TNC's own website confirms "approximately 17,000 acres of former ranch and dairy lands" under TNC management — the most defensible acreage figure, superseding earlier reports of 16,000 or 18,000 acres; confirmed March 2026]
[H7] Ipsen, L. (2025, October 17). Logan's comments: Oh, the irony [column]. Western Livestock Journal. https://www.wlj.net/logans-comments-oh-the-irony/ [Primary source documenting TNC cooperative agreement lease structure: 5-year initial term + 20-year option + two additional 10-year options = 45 years total; also confirms $10M California Wildlife Conservation Board grant secured before settlement was finalized]
[H8] Westerman, B. (2025, April). Letter from Chair Bruce Westerman, House Committee on Natural Resources, to The Nature Conservancy, National Park Service, and related parties [document preservation and production request]. U.S. House of Representatives. https://naturalresources.house.gov [House Natural Resources Committee investigation of the January 2025 settlement; demand for primary document production]
[H9] Brennan, D. (2025, April 12). Rep. Jared Huffman says House investigation of Point Reyes ranching deal driven by 'partisan opportunists.' Press Democrat. https://www.pressdemocrat.com/article/news/rep-jared-huffman-says-house-investigation-of-point-reyes-ranching-deal-driven-by-partisan-opportunists/ ["Partisan opportunist" quote confirmed via independent verification, March 2026]
[H10] Huffman, J. (FY 2024). San Francisco North Bay Dairy Community Transition Assistance [$1,000,000; FY 2024 Community Projects]. Office of U.S. Representative Jared Huffman. https://huffman.house.gov/san-francisco-north-bay-dairy-community-transition-assistance [$1M federal fund to assist displaced dairy community; confirmed primary source]

Note on the $30 million TNC settlement figure and acreage: The $30 million figure has been widely reported in news media including the Press Democrat and Point Reyes Light and is referenced in legal filings in the Northern District of California. An independent appraisal was not conducted as part of the public record. The most defensible acreage figure is 17,000 acres, sourced to TNC's own website (H6), which supersedes earlier reports of 16,000 or 18,000 acres in other documents. Greg Burgess's campaign treats all reported figures as reported, not independently verified unless otherwise noted.